Why Projections Has Drawn 12 Expert Recommendations

Projections, by neuroscientist Karl Deisseroth, has been named twelve times across appearances by Lex Fridman and Andrew Huberman, a sizable count for a book that only recently landed on the recommendation circuit. Two of those mentions are captured directly here, and both come from hosts describing the book as more than just informative, they call it genuinely well written.

Lex Fridman puts it simply: "Carl daero he uh wrote the book projections one of my favorite first of all just as you said incredible writer just amazing." Andrew Huberman, on a separate episode, describes reading it in real time: "there's a book that he just published that i'm listening to now... it's called projections and it's a beautiful read you'll learn a ton of neuroscience."

Fridman's praise is notably about craft rather than content. "Carl daero he uh wrote the book projections one of my favorite first of all just as you said incredible writer just amazing," he says, leading with the quality of the writing before anything about the science inside it. That is a specific kind of compliment, distinct from calling a book useful or informative.

It suggests Projections is being recommended in this archive the way a well written memoir or narrative nonfiction book gets recommended, on the strength of the prose itself, not purely as a reference text for neuroscience facts.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Huberman's mention adds a different kind of detail: he was actively partway through the book when he brought it up. "There's a book that he just published that i'm listening to now," he says, "it's called projections and it's a beautiful read you'll learn a ton of neuroscience." That is a live, in progress recommendation, not a book recalled from years earlier.

Combining Huberman's "beautiful read" with the promise that listeners "will learn a ton of neuroscience" points to the same pattern Fridman's quote suggests, a book that works simultaneously as genuine literature and as a real source of scientific content, rather than one at the expense of the other.

Twelve recorded recommendations for a book Huberman describes as newly published is a fast climb compared to older, more established titles in this archive. Books like Why We Sleep and Radical Acceptance have had years to accumulate dozens of mentions each. Projections reaching a double digit count this early suggests the two hosts captured here are actively pushing it toward the same kind of repeat status those older titles already hold.

That trajectory is itself a form of evidence. A brand new book does not get named across separate appearances by more than one host unless it is making a real impression rather than simply making the rounds as a publicity favor. It also means the count behind this piece is likely a floor rather than a ceiling, since the book was still being read by at least one of the hosts at the time of these recordings.

For comparison, the other repeat titles surfacing throughout this archive, Why We Sleep, Radical Acceptance, Dopamine Nation, all reached their much higher totals gradually, mention by mention, over a period of years rather than months. Projections arriving at a double digit count this quickly is the outlier worth watching.

The broader pattern in this archive is consistent regardless of how new or old a book is. Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker has been recommended 59 times, with Andrew Huberman crediting author Matthew Walker across multiple separate episodes, once calling him "the one and only Mighty Matt Walker." Radical Acceptance by Tara Brach has been recommended 50 times, named by Tim Ferriss and independently seconded by guest BJ Miller as "very very particularly helpful."

What connects those older, heavily repeated titles to a newer one like Projections is that in every case, more than one voice is doing the recommending. A single enthusiastic mention is easy to find in any archive this size. A book two different hosts both bring up unprompted is a smaller, more meaningful category.

Given the topics this archive circles most often, mood, anxiety, brain function, sleep, a book Huberman promises will teach "a ton of neuroscience" is a natural fit even before considering the writing quality Fridman praises. Dopamine Nation by Anna Lembke shows the same overlap, a book grounded in brain science that Huberman calls "wonderful" and that guest Martha Beck independently praises the same way.

The difference with Projections is timing. Where Dopamine Nation and Why We Sleep built their recommendation counts over years, Projections is picking up multiple independent endorsements while it is still new, which, if the pattern seen elsewhere in this archive holds, suggests its count is likely to keep climbing.

Who wrote Projections and what is it about?

Karl Deisseroth wrote it. Based on how it is described here, Andrew Huberman calls it a beautiful read that teaches a lot of neuroscience, while Lex Fridman praises Deisseroth specifically as an incredible writer.

Is Projections recommended for the science or the writing?

Both, according to the two mentions captured here. Fridman leads with praise for the writing itself, while Huberman frames it as a beautiful read that also teaches real neuroscience content, rather than treating those as separate qualities.

Two mentions, both unprompted, both from hosts rather than guests, and both praising the writing as much as the science. For a book Huberman describes as newly published, a count of twelve recorded recommendations already puts Projections on the same trajectory as older, heavily repeated titles like Why We Sleep and Radical Acceptance, books that earned their place in this archive by getting named again and again rather than once.